As with many retail businesses, the Nero Group has been seriously impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic.

The company is the tenant of 619 stores and in November 2020 the directors proposed a Company Voluntary Arrangement, which is a statutory compromise voted on by creditors. The CVA proposal was principally focused on the company’s landlords, seeking to compromise the terms of the leases as to arrears of rent, future rent, service charges and insurance.

The creditors voted in favour of the CVA in December 2020.

The legal challenge (Carraway Guildford (Nominee A) Limited and Others v Regis UK Limited and Others, No. 8276 of 2018) by landlords against a retail company voluntary arrangement (CVA) was accepted by Mr Justice Zacaroli.

- Jurisdiction and unfair prejudice open to review on appeal

First instance decision

Landlords on 10th May lost their legal challenge at first instance against fashion retailer New Look’s use of a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) it put in place to help it restructure its business.

The landlords argued several points of challenge in their original application, most importantly from a legal and commercial perspective that CVA jurisdiction does not extend to complex, differential arrangements.

A balancing act

Creditors with legitimate grounds to challenge scheme or restructuring plan proposals and who assist the court in so doing should not be unduly discouraged by the costs regime. At the same time, frivolous arguments should not be supported with the promise of a costs award without consideration of party’s interests and other factors.

Virgin Active restructuring plans